Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-7597•David Rodriguez v. STEVIE KNIGHT, Warden
21-7597Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.04.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7597
DAVID RODRIGUEZ,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
STEVIE KNIGHT, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee,
and
MELISSA FORSYTH, Camp Administrator,
Respondent.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:21-cv-00305-HMH)
Submitted: April 26, 2022 Decided: April 29, 2022
Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Rodriguez, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Federal prisoner David Rodriguez appeals the district court’s order accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Respondent summary judgment and dismiss
Rodriguez’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Review of the record confirms the district court’s
holding that Rodriguez failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing his
§ 2241 petition. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal order. Rodriguez v.
Knight, No. 9:21-cv-00305-HMH (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2021). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.