Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-7620•Brandon Jennings v. R. HUDGINS, Warden
21-7620Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.03.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7620
BRANDON JENNINGS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
R. HUDGINS, Warden; P. ADAMS, Warden; P. MCKONE, Commissary/Trust
Fund Officer; MASCOLA, Case Manager; L. T. CRUZE, SIS Lieutenant; JORGE,
F-2 Counselor; DR. SEYMOUR, Psych; YANASH, F-2 Case Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Clarksburg. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (1:21-cv-00090-JPB-JPM)
Submitted: March 24, 2022 Decided: March 29, 2022
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brandon Marquis Jennings, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brandon Marquis Jennings appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
complaint without prejudice after he failed to pay the initial partial filing fee. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Jennings v. Hudgins, No. 1:21-cv-00090-JPB-JPM (N.D.W.
Va. Nov. 5, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.