Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-7644•United States of America v. ROOSEVELT SPANN, JR., a/k/a Russell Rice, Jr., a/k/a Peachy
21-7644Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.04.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7644
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROOSEVELT SPANN, JR., a/k/a Russell Rice, Jr., a/k/a Peachy,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cr-00179-RDB-1)
Submitted: March 29, 2022 Decided: April 1, 2022
Before HARRIS, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roosevelt Spann, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Roosevelt Spann, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for
compassionate release and for home confinement. We have reviewed the record on appeal
and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Spann’s motions.
See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (providing standard), cert. denied,
142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v.
Spann, No. 1:06-cr-00179-RDB-1 (D. Md. Nov. 9, 2021). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.