Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-7675•William D. Credle v. Roy Cooper
21-7675Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.10.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7675
WILLIAM D. CREDLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROY COOPER; ERIK A. HOOKS; TODD ISHEE; PAULA SMITH; MICHAEL
REGAN; MIKE CAUSEY; JAMES VAUGHAN; DOCTOR EVANS; NURSE
HUX; UNIT MANAGER DUNLOW,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:21-ct-03162-D)
Submitted: September 16, 2022 Decided: October 24, 2022
Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William D. Credle, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William D. Credle appeals the district court’s order dismissing, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging First, Eighth, and
Fourteenth Amendment violations by defendants. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Credle v. Cooper,
No. 5:21-ct-03162-D, 2021 WL 5822264 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2021). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.