Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-7678•United States of America v. Demetrios Donell McNeill
21-7678Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.05.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7678
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DEMETRIOS DONELL MCNEILL,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 22-6297
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DEMETRIOS DONELL MCNEILL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:15-cr-00318-D-1)
Submitted: May 19, 2022 Decided: May 23, 2022
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Demetrios Donell McNeill, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Demetrios Donell McNeill appeals the district court’s
order denying his third motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We review a district
court’s denial of a motion for compassionate release for an abuse of discretion. See United
States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
orders. United States v. McNeill, No. 5:15-cr-00318-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 12, 2021; Mar.
2, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.