Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
22-1042•Derrick Michael Allen, Sr. v. Domino’s; Justin Kiger; James Thompson
22-1042Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.04.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1042
DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DOMINO’S; JUSTIN KIGER; JAMES THOMPSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:20-cv-00205-TDS-LPA)
Submitted: April 14, 2022 Decided: April 19, 2022
Before DIAZ and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Michael Allen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derrick Michael Allen, Sr., who filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, appeals
the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing Allen’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Allen v. Domino’s, No. 1:20-cv-00205-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 2022).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.