Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
22-1297•Hui Minn Lee v. Market America, Inc.
22-1297Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit10.09.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1297
HUI MINN LEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARKET AMERICA, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:18-cv-01046-WO-JLW)
Submitted: September 8, 2022 Decided: September 12, 2022
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hui Minn Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Camilla Frances DeBoard, TEAGUE,
ROTENSTREICH, STANALAND, FOX & HOLT, P.L.L.C., Greensboro, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Hui Minn Lee appeals the district court’s judgment entered in favor of Market
America, Inc., on Lee’s retaliation and discrimination claims, brought pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1981, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17,
and North Carolina’s Equal Employment Practices Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 143.422.1 to
143.422.3. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s judgment. See Lee v. Market Am., Inc., No. 1:18-cv-01046-WO-
JLW (M.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.