Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
22-1506•In re: D.J.M., Party Below.
22-1506Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.02.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1506
RONALD D. METCALF, Parent/advocate, legal guardian as lawful guardian ad
litem of Minor Child D. J. M.; CLAUDIA METCALF, Parent/advocate, legal
guardian as lawful guardian ad litem of Minor Child D. J. M,
Petitioners - Appellants,
and
In re: D.J.M.,
Party Below.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:22-mc-00013-MR-WCM)
Submitted: January 31, 2023 Decided: February 16, 2023
Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ron David Metcalf, Claudia Metcalf, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ron and Claudia Metcalf appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their “petition
for review of whole record, and for competent attorney to facilitate procedure” without
prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), imposing a pre-filing review system, and
denying their motion to recuse. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. In re Metcalf, No.
1:22-mc-00013-MR-WCM (W.D.N.C. Apr. 5 & 22, 2022). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.