Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
22-1634•Kendrick Oyola v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
22-1634Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15.02.2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1634
KENDRICK OYOLA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:21-cv-00540-PX)
Submitted: November 27, 2023 Decided: February 14, 2024
Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kendrick Oyola, Appellant Pro Se. James Clay Rollins, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH
SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kendrick Oyola appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to
dismiss his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Oyola v. Washington
Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 8:21-cv-00540-PX (D. Md. May 27, 2022). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.