In re: District Clerk’s Office Operations, ------------------------------- Marie Therese…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1742
In re: DISTRICT CLERK’S OFFICE OPERATIONS,
-------------------------------
MARIE THERESE ASSA’AD-FALTAS,
Movant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (3:21-mc-00341-RBH)
Submitted: January 24, 2023 Decided: February 1, 2023
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s order accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny Assa’ad-Faltas’ motion for a temporary
restraining order or for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and
conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Assa’ad-Faltas’
motion. Roe v. Dep’t of Def., 947 F.3d 207, 219 (4th Cir. 2020) (stating standard of
review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. In re Dist. Clerk’s Off.
Operations, No. 3:21-mc-00341-RBH (D.S.C. Oct. 29, 2021). We deny as moot Assa’ad-
Faltas’ motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --