John McSheffrey v. Lily I. Wilder, in her individual

22-1800Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12.04.2023

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1800
JOHN MCSHEFFREY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LILY I. WILDER, in her individual and Official capacities; RYAN B. DAVIS, in
his individual and Official capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 22-2131
JOHN P. MCSHEFFREY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LILY I. WILDER, in her individual and Official capacities; RYAN B. DAVIS, in
his individual and Official capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Robert John Krask, Magistrate Judge. (2:21-cv-00630-RJK)
Submitted: January 6, 2023 Decided: April 12, 2023

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John McSheffrey, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret A. Kelly, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,
Norfolk, Virginia.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
John McSheffrey appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a
preliminary injunction and denying his motion to amend his notice of appeal. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. McSheffrey v. Wilder, No. 2:21-cv-00630-RJK (E.D. Va.
July 18 & Oct. 18, 2022). We grant McSheffrey’s corrected motion to file a corrected
document, his corrected motions to amend/correct, and his motion for leave to file. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.