Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
22-1832•Emma Johnston v. Envision Physician Services, Hr
22-1832Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.01.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1832
EMMA JOHNSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ENVISION PHYSICIAN SERVICES, HR,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-01064-AJT-IDD)
Submitted: January 17, 2023 Decided: January 19, 2023
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emma Johnston, Appellant Pro Se. Amy M. Pocklington, William Ryan Waddell,
OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Emma Johnston appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment
in favor of her former employer in her employment discrimination action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Johnston v. Envision Physician Servs., HR, No. 1:21-cv-01064-
AJT-IDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 2, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.