Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
22-1972•Lorenzo Richardson v. Raul Lopez; John Doe 1; John Doe 2
22-1972Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.02.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1972
LORENZO RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RAUL LOPEZ; JOHN DOE 1; JOHN DOE 2,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:21-cv-00413-BO)
Submitted: February 16, 2023 Decided: February 21, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lorenzo Dominic Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lorenzo Richardson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for
lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm. Richardson v. Lopez, No. 5:21-cv-00413-BO (E.D.N.C.
Aug. 15, 2022). We deny Richardson’s motion to expedite as moot. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.