Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
22-2031•Dwane D. Heyward v. Careteam Plus, Inc.
22-2031Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.05.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-2031
DWANE D. HEYWARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CARETEAM PLUS, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
JOHANNA HAYNES,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (4:21-cv-00754-JD)
Submitted: May 18, 2023 Decided: May 22, 2023
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dwane D. Heyward, Appellant Pro Se. Cherie Wilson Blackburn, Mary Stuart King,
MAYNARD NEXSEN, PC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dwane D. Heyward appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation and granting Careteam Plus, Inc., summary judgment on
Heyward’s discriminatory discharge and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Heyward v. Careteam Plus, Inc., No. 4:21-cv-00754-JD (D.S.C. Sept. 8,
2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.