Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
22-2038•Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr. v. Railroad Retirement Board
22-2038Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.06.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-2038
ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:22-cv-00019-GMG-RWT)
Submitted: June 15, 2023 Decided: June 20, 2023
Before DIAZ, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Hairston v. R.R. Ret. Bd., No.
3:22-cv-00019-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 22, 2022). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.