Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
22-2084•Cavour Ndam v. Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft, a/k/a Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft Inc.
22-2084Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.06.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-2084
CAVOUR NDAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, a/k/a Deutsche Lufthansa
Aktiengesellschaft Inc.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Patricia Tolliver Giles, District Judge. (1:21-cv-01258-PTG-WEF)
Submitted: February 7, 2023 Decided: June 22, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Circuit Judge, and WILKINSON and RUSHING, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cavour Ndam, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Michael Stern, SCHNADER, HARRISON,
SEGAL & LEWIS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cavour Ndam appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint based
on its finding that Ndam committed fraud on the court. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Ndam v.
Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft, No. 1:21-cv-01258-PTG-WEF (E.D. Va. Sept. 15,
2022). We deny Ndam’s motion to supplement the record on appeal by uploading digital
audio recordings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.