Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
22-6050•Eric Martin Pepke v. R. WILSON, Acting Warden PEX
22-6050Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13.09.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6050
ERIC MARTIN PEPKE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
R. WILSON, Acting Warden PEX,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00007-TSE-TCB)
Submitted: September 8, 2022 Decided: September 13, 2022
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Martin Pepke, Appellant Pro Se. Marc Birnbaum, Special Assistant United States
Attorney, Tony Ray Roberts, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eric Martin Pepke appeals the district court’s order denying relief without prejudice
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he sought to challenge his criminal judgment by
way of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Having reviewed the record and finding no
reversible error, we affirm the decision of the district court. Pepke v. Wilson, No. 1:21-cv-
00007-TSE-TCB (E.D. Va. Dec. 17, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.