Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
22-6416•Marcos F. Santiago v. United States of America
22-6416Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.03.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6416
MARCOS F. SANTIAGO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee.
No. 22-6580
MARCOS F. SANTIAGO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:21-cv-00436-JPJ-PMS)
Submitted: March 21, 2023 Decided: March 23, 2023
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcos F. Santiago, Appellant Pro Se. Krista Consiglio Frith, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNTED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Marcos F. Santiago appeals the district court’s orders dismissing for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction his civil action seeking relief under the Federal Tort Claims Act,
28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80, and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to reconsider.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s orders. Santiago v. United States, No. 7:21-cv-00436-JPJ-PMS (W.D. Va.
Mar. 14, 2022 & Mar. 28, 2022). We deny Santiago’s motions for appointment of counsel,
to compel or direct the United States to respond, and for consideration of new evidence.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.