Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
22-6496•Jeovanny D. Rodriguez-Porras v. Demetrius A. Clark; Ms. White; Nurse Pieare; Nurse Allen; Dr. Raven J. Barnes
22-6496Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.08.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6496
JEOVANNY D. RODRIGUEZ-PORRAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEMETRIUS A. CLARK; MS. WHITE; NURSE PIEARE; NURSE ALLEN; DR.
RAVEN J. BARNES,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
BERTIE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:21-ct-03275-BO)
Submitted: August 23, 2022 Decided: August 26, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, HEYTENS, Circuit Judge, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Jeovanny D. Rodriguez-Porras, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Jeovanny D. Rodriguez-Porras appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Rodriguez-Porras v. Bertie Corr. Inst., No. 5:21-ct-03275-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 4, 2022).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.