Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
22-6626•Dalton Alonzo Dixon v. State of North Carolina; State of Virginia
22-6626Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.11.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6626
DALTON ALONZO DIXON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; STATE OF VIRGINIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 22-6695
DALTON ALONZO DIXON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; STATE OF VIRGINIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:21-ct-03291-D)
Submitted: November 17, 2022 Decided: November 23, 2022
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dalton Alonzo Dixon, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated cases, Dalton Alonzo Dixon appeals the district court’s orders
(a) dismissing Dixon’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b); and
(b) denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. Having reviewed
the record and finding no reversible error, we affirm the district court’s orders. Dixon v.
North Carolina, No. 5:21-ct-03291-D (E.D.N.C. Apr. 18, 2022 & May 27, 2022). We
deny Dixon’s motions for leave to file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.