United States of America v. Wayne Earl Jenkins

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7124
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WAYNE EARL JENKINS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cr-00106-CCB-4)
Submitted: February 16, 2023 Decided: February 22, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne Earl Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Wayne Earl Jenkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his “Motion
to Reopen and for Reconsideration of Restitution.” But no such order exists because the
district court has yet to resolve Jenkins’ motion. The last action that the district court took
on the motion was ordering a Government response. To the extent that Jenkins might seek
to appeal that order, it is not appealable. See United States v. Doe, 962 F.3d 139, 143 (4th
Cir. 2020) (“[W]e have jurisdiction only over final orders and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders”). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --