Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
22-7149•Robert William Lose, Jr. v. Cps Officer
22-7149Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.03.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7149
ROBERT WILLIAM LOSE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CPS OFFICER; FELICA BACHOR, CPS Worker/DHHR Worker; CONGRESS OF THE
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; DEPUTY OF CPS CHARSTEN, WV; MARION
COUNTY CPS OFFICE; MORGANTOWN WV CPS OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:22-cv-00213-JPB)
Submitted: March 21, 2023 Decided: March 24, 2023
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert William Lose, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Lose, Jr., appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s
recommendation and dismissing without prejudice Lose’s civil action challenging a state
court custody decision pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).* On appeal, we confine our review
to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Lose’s informal
brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177
(4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules,
our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The district court’s order is final and appealable because the court did not give
Lose leave to amend his complaint. See Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 796 (4th Cir. 2022).
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.