Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
22-7156•Howard Lee Covington, Jr. v. Dr. Clarence L. Faulcon
22-7156Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.02.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7156
HOWARD LEE COVINGTON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. CLARENCE L. FAULCON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:20-ct-03197-M)
Submitted: February 21, 2023 Decided: February 24, 2023
Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Howard Lee Covington, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Joshua M. Hiller, Pankaj Kashiram Shere,
HUFF POWELL & BAILEY, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Howard Lee Covington, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging inadequate medical care during his incarceration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s judgment. Covington v. Faulcon, No. 5:20-ct-03197-M (E.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2022).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.