Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
22-7331•Melvin Lee Luckey v. GLEN JENKINS, Detective
22-7331Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.03.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7331
MELVIN LEE LUCKEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GLEN JENKINS, Detective; T. J. GOFORTH, Detective, Lieutenant; CITY OF
MONROE; BRANDON BLACKMON, State Bureau Agent; JASMINE CRUZE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (3:22-cv-00369-MR)
Submitted: March 16, 2023 Decided: March 21, 2023
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Melvin Lee Luckey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Melvin Lee Luckey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Luckey v. Jenkins, No. 3:22-cv-00369-MR (W.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 2022). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.