United States of America v. Roy Chapman Correll

22-7414Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.07.2023

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7414
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROY CHAPMAN CORRELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (3:21-cr-00001-NKM-JCH-1)
Submitted: July 20, 2023 Decided: July 24, 2023
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roy Chapman Correll, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Barish Swartz, Special Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Roy Chapman Correll appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s denial of
a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d
326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court
did not abuse its discretion and sufficiently explained the reasons for the denial.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Correll, No. 3:21-cr-
00001-NKM-JCH-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 22, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.