Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-1098•Madhu Verma v. Daniel A. Staeven
23-1098Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.11.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1098
MADHU VERMA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DANIEL A. STAEVEN,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
REBECCA ANNE HERR,
Trustee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:22-cv-01130-DKC)
Submitted: November 21, 2023 Decided: November 27, 2023
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Madhu Verma, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Madhu Verma appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s
order granting Daniel A. Staeven’s motion for entry of judgment. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Verma v. Staeven, No. 8:22-cv-01130-DKC (D. Md. Dec. 22, 2022). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.