Kevin Alexander Flores Lemus v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General

23-1121Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.05.2024

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1121
KEVIN ALEXANDER FLORES LEMUS,
Petitioner,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: February 6, 2024 Decided: May 2, 2024
Before WILKINSON, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Eleni R. Bakst, CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS’ RIGHTS (CAIR)
COALITION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioner. Brian Boynton, Principal Deputy
Assistant Attorney General, Carl McIntyre, Assistant Director, Brooke M. Maurer, Office
of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Alexander Flores Lemus, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion the
Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and
protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and Flores
Lemus’ claims and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of
the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial
evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Flores Lemus (B.I.A. Jan. 9, 2023).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.