Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-1370•Eric Goudy, Ii v. Navy Federal Credit Union
23-1370Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.03.2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1370
ERIC GOUDY, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:23-cv-00339-LMB-LRV)
Submitted: February 27, 2024 Decided: February 29, 2024
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Goudy, II, Appellant Pro Se. David M. Gettings, TROUTMAN PEPPER
HAMILTON SANDERS LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eric Goudy, II, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint as
frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, affirm the district court’s order. Goudy v. Navy Fed. Credit
Union, No. 1:23-cv-00339-LMB-LRV (E.D. Va. Mar. 21, 2023). However, we modify the
district court’s order to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice. See Thomas v.
Salvation Army S. Territory, 841 F.3d 632, 642 (4th Cir. 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.