Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-1495•Raymond Romig v. Montgomery County
23-1495Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.10.2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1495
RAYMOND ROMIG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:21-cv-01475)
Submitted: September 13, 2024 Decided: October 3, 2024
Before AGEE and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: John M. Shoreman, MCFADDEN & SHOREMAN, Washington, D.C., for
Appellant. John P. Markovs, County Attorney, Edward B. Lattner, Deputy County
Attorney, Matthew H. Johnson, Associate County Attorney, Erin J. Ashbarry, Associate
County Attorney, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Rockville, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Romig appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Romig v. Montgomery Cnty., No. 8:21-cv-01475-TDC
(D. Md. Mar. 31, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.