Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-1528•Eric Katz v. MERRICK GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
23-1528Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.02.2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1528
ERIC KATZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MERRICK GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-00554-TSE-JFA)
Submitted: January 30, 2024 Decided: February 2, 2024
Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Katz, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth A. Spavins, Assistant United States Attorney,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eric Katz appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant summary judgment
on Katz’s discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 to 796l, and on his constructive discharge claim.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. Katz v. Garland, No. 1:20-cv-00554-TSE-JFA (E.D. Va. Mar. 16,
2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.