Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-1570•Brandy Thompson v. LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, Secretary of Defense; DOE 1; DOE 2; DOE 3
23-1570Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.12.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1570
BRANDY THOMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, Secretary of Defense; DOE 1; DOE 2; DOE 3,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:21-cv-00283-M)
Submitted: December 14, 2023 Decided: December 18, 2023
Before GREGORY and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brandy Thompson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brandy Thompson appeals the district court’s order granting the United States
Secretary of Defense summary judgment on Thompson’s discrimination, retaliation, and
harassment claims, brought pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29
U.S.C. §§ 701 to 796l, and on her state law tort claims. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Thompson v.
Austin, No. 5:21-cv-00283-M (E.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2023). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.