Major Mike Webb, d/b/a Friends for Mike Webb (C00591537), agent of Major Mike Webb… v. James Christian Kimmel

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1580
MAJOR MIKE WEBB, d/b/a Friends for Mike Webb (C00591537), agent of Major
Mike Webb for Congress (H8VA08167), a/k/a Major Mike for VA, a/k/a Mike
Webb for APS Board, agent of Major Mike Webb for APS Board,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES CHRISTIAN KIMMEL; WUSA9, a/k/a Channel 9; AMERICAN
BROADCAST COMPANY INC., a/k/a Jimmy Kimmel Live!; WJLA TV, a/k/a
News Channel 8; ABC LEGAL SERVICES; SINCLAIR BROADCAST GROUP;
JANE AND JOHN DOES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:22-cv-00392-MHL)
Submitted: October 31, 2023 Decided: November 2, 2023
Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mike Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick John Curran, Jr., Nathan Ellis Siegel, DAVIS
WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Laurin Howard Mills, WERTHER &

-- 1 of 3 --

2
MILLS, LLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Mike Webb appeals the district court’s order dismissing his second amended
complaint for failure to comply with the court’s instructions to particularize his claims and
for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and the court’s order
denying his request for default judgment. We have reviewed Webb’s second amended
complaint and conclude that the district court correctly found that Webb failed to provide
specific factual allegations in support of his claims. Furthermore, while Webb argues on
appeal that the district court erred in denying his request for default judgment against three
of the Defendants, the court properly denied Webb’s request on the ground that those
Defendants were never served. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Accordingly, we affirm. Webb v.
Kimmel, No. 3:22-cv-00392-MHL (E.D. Va. May 3, 2023; May 18, 2023). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --