Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-1585•Estefani Jamilet Abarca Ayala v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
23-1585Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.10.2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1585
ESTEFANI JAMILET ABARCA AYALA,
Petitioner,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: August 30, 2024 Decided: October 16, 2024
Before GREGORY and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Ivan Yacub, YACUB LAW OFFICES, LLC, Woodbridge, Virginia, for
Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Shelley R.
Goad, Assistant Director, Carmel A. Morgan, Senior Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration
Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Estefani Jamilet Abarca Ayala, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing her appeal from the
Immigration Judge’s denial of Abarca Ayala’s applications for asylum and withholding of
removal. We have reviewed the record and Abarca Ayala’s claims and conclude that the
evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings,
see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief,
see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition
for review. In re Abarca Ayala (B.I.A. May 17, 2023). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.