Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-1908•Fenyang Ajamu Stewart v. GINA M. RAIMONDO, Hon.
23-1908Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.02.2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1908
FENYANG AJAMU STEWART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GINA M. RAIMONDO, Hon., in her official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department
of Commerce; KATHI VIDAL, in her official capacity as Director, United States
Patent & Trademark Office,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01369-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: January 30, 2024 Decided: February 2, 2024
Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fenyang Ajamu Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Fenyang Ajamu Stewart appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ.
P. 60(b)(2) motion for relief from judgment based on newly discovered evidence. Upon
review, we discern no error in the district court’s ruling. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. Stewart v. Raimondo, No. 1:18-cv-01369-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. June 26,
2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.