Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-6002•United States of America v. Philip Ketter
23-6002Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.05.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6002
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PHILIP KETTER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:19-cr-00183-RJC-DCK-5)
Submitted: May 18, 2023 Decided: May 23, 2023
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Philip Ketter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Philip Ketter appeals the district court’s order denying Ketter’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 36
motion. We have conducted a de novo review of the record and find no reversible error.
See United States v. Vanderhorst, 927 F.3d 824, 826 (4th Cir. 2019) (providing standard
of review for Rule 36 motion). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See United States v. Ketter, No. 3:19-cr-00183-RJC-DCK-5 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 12,
2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.