Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-6233•Malcolm A. Jordan v. Jordan Fly
23-6233Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.05.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6233
MALCOLM A. JORDAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JORDAN FLY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:23-ct-03013-BO-RJ)
Submitted: May 23, 2023 Decided: May 26, 2023
Before AGEE, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcolm A. Jordan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Malcom A. Jordan appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for
failure to comply with the magistrate judge’s order directing Jordan to correct certain
deficiencies in his complaint. Although the magistrate judge warned Jordan that failure to
comply could result in the dismissal of his action, Jordan did not remedy the identified
deficiencies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. Jordan v. Fly, No. 5:23-ct-03013-BO-RJ (E.D.N.C. signed
Feb. 23 & entered Feb. 24, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.