United States of America v. Jamie Lubell Dixon

23-6236Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.06.2023

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6236
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMIE LUBELL DIXON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cr-00305-CMC-1)
Submitted: June 22, 2023 Decided: June 27, 2023
Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamie Lubell Dixon, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jamie Lubell Dixon appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). Limiting our review of the record
to the issues raised in Dixon’s informal brief, we conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion by denying Dixon’s motion. See United States v. Malone, 57 F.4th
167, 172 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard of review); see also 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v.
Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document;
under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Dixon, No. 3:11-cr-
00305-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.