Warren Matthew Giddings v. Corizon; Mr. Rorher; McTc Nurse; Centurion Behavioral Health Staff

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6300
WARREN MATTHEW GIDDINGS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CORIZON; MR. RORHER; MCTC NURSE; CENTURION BEHAVIORAL
HEALTH STAFF,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Lydia Kay Griggsby, District Judge. (1:21-cv-03166-LKG)
Submitted: January 31, 2024 Decided: February 23, 2024
Before DIAZ, Chief Judge, and RICHARDSON and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Warren Matthew Giddings, Appellant Pro Se. Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, MARKS,
O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee
Corizon.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Warren Matthew Giddings appeals the district court’s order granting summary
judgment to Corizon on his claims raised pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and dismissing the
remaining Defendants. On appeal, Corizon has filed a suggestion of bankruptcy and notice
of automatic stay informing this court that it commenced Chapter 11 bankruptcy
proceedings in February 2023. The automatic stay precludes us from reviewing the district
court’s disposition of Giddings’ claims against Corizon. As to the court’s disposition of
Giddings’ claims against the remaining Defendants, we have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Giddings’ motion to proceed under the Prison
Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), and affirm the district court’s order as to all
defendants except Corizon. Giddings v. Corizon, No. 1:21-cv-03166-LKG (D. Md. Jan.
25, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART

-- 2 of 2 --