Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-6346•Donald Reynolds v. D. L. YOUNG, Warden
23-6346Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.08.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6346
DONALD REYNOLDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
D. L. YOUNG, Warden; MANNING, SIS Officer; SWEENY, SIS Officer;
WISEMAN, Mailroom Officer; BANTON, Mailroom Officer; ANSLEY, Mailroom
Officer; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Beckley. Frank W. Volk, District Judge. (5:20-cv-00753)
Submitted: August 24, 2023 Decided: August 29, 2023
Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Reynolds appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge to deny Reynolds summary judgment and grant Defendants
summary judgment in Reynolds’ action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named
Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Reynolds
v. Young, No. 5:20-cv-00753 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 30, 2023). We deny Reynolds’ motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.