Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-6350•Luke Joseph Warner v. Warden Ramos; Fmc Devens; Fbop-Dscc; Fbop; Us Doj; Usdc-Hi; Usca9; Usdc-Ma; Usca1
23-6350Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.10.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6350
LUKE JOSEPH WARNER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN RAMOS; FMC DEVENS; FBOP-DSCC; FBOP; US DOJ; USDC-HI;
USCA9; USDC-MA; USCA1,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:22-hc-02100-D)
Submitted: September 28, 2023 Decided: October 3, 2023
Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luke Joseph Warner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Luke Joseph Warner, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he challenged the execution of his sentence.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s orders. Warner v. Ramos, No. 5:22-hc-02100-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 23, 2022
& Mar. 21, 2023). We deny Warner’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.