Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-6416•Larry Williams v. Warden Kelly
23-6416Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.06.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6416
LARRY WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN KELLY; JAMES SAVGE; DOC DEEZIEN; PAM C. KELLY; SUSAN
THOMAS JAMES; AL GREEN; S. QUE; PAT BARFIELD; JOE HARRIS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Orangeburg. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (5:22-cv-00004-MGL)
Submitted: June 22, 2023 Decided: June 27, 2023
Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing Williams’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Williams v. Kelly, No. 5:22-cv-00004-MGL (D.S.C.
Apr. 12, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.