Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-6548•United States of America v. Randell Brice Harris, a/k/a Randall Brice Harris
23-6548Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.02.2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6548
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RANDELL BRICE HARRIS, a/k/a Randall Brice Harris,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:94-cr-00012-MOC-2)
Submitted: February 13, 2024 Decided: February 16, 2024
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randell Brice Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Randell Brice Harris appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release and his motion for reconsideration. We
review a court’s order denying a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion.
United States v. Brown, 78 F.4th 122, 127 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard of review). We
have reviewed the record and conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion.
Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.