Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-6671•Brian Levar Watson v. Charles Eason
23-6671Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.11.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6671
BRIAN LEVAR WATSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES EASON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:21-ct-03167-M)
Submitted: November 16, 2023 Decided: November 22, 2023
Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian Levar Watson, Appellant Pro Se. Dan M. Hartzog, Jr., Rachel Gail Posey,
HARTZOG LAW GROUP LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brian Levar Watson appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant Charles
Eason’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissing Watson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. Watson v. Eason, No. 5:21-ct-03167-M (E.D.N.C. June
21, 2023). We further grant Defendant Eason’s motion to strike the documents attached to
Watson’s supplemental reply brief, as these documents were not considered by the district
court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.