United States of America v. Jarvaris Antwan Andrews

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6760
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JARVARIS ANTWAN ANDREWS,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 23-6761
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JARVARIS ANTOINE ANDREWS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, Chief District Judge. (1:08-cr-00144-CCE-1;
1:20-cr-00133-CCE-1)
Submitted: October 31, 2023 Decided: November 3, 2023

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jarvaris Antwan Andrews, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Jarvaris Antwan Andrews appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for reduction of sentence. After review of the record, we conclude
that the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that such relief was not
warranted in light of relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors after balancing those factors
against Andrews’ arguments. See United States v. Bethea, 54 F.4th 826, 831, 834 (4th Cir.
2022) (noting standard of review, conclusions district court must draw to grant motion, and
guideposts for determining whether court has abused its discretion in considering 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) factors). Accordingly, we affirm the court’s order. United States v. Andrews,
Nos. 1:08-cr-00144-CCE-1; 1:20-cr-00133-CCE-1 (M.D.N.C. July 11, 2023).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --