Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-6762•United States of America v. Dwight Ulmer, a/k/a Saybro
23-6762Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.08.2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6762
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DWIGHT ULMER, a/k/a Saybro,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:20-cr-00131-FL-1)
Submitted: July 30, 2024 Decided: August 1, 2024
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dwight Ulmer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dwight Ulmer appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motions for compassionate release. The district court concluded that
Ulmer failed to demonstrate extraordinary and compelling reasons for relief and that the
relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors independently weighed against his early release. After
reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
denying Ulmer’s motions. See United States v. Brown, 78 F.4th 122, 127 (4th Cir. 2023)
(stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United
States v. Ulmer, No. 5:20-cr-00131-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. July 31, 2023). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.