Douglas E. Melter v. United States of America, named as United States Employed

23-6812Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.06.2024

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6812
DOUGLAS E. MELTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, named as United States Employed,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:22-cv-00391-MHL-MRC)
Submitted: May 30, 2024 Decided: June 3, 2024
Before GREGORY and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas E. Melter, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Douglas E. Melter appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action filed
under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Melter v. United States, No. 3:22-cv-00391-MHL-MRC (E.D. Va. July 3, 2023). We deny
Melter’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.