Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-6912•David Antonio Little, Jr. v. CODY DIXON, Chesterfield County Sheriff; DAVID BROWN, Chesterfield County Sheriff
23-6912Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit07.02.2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6912
DAVID ANTONIO LITTLE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CODY DIXON, Chesterfield County Sheriff; DAVID BROWN, Chesterfield
County Sheriff,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
TYLER GOLDBACH, MD; JAMES DIXON, Sheriff,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (0:22-cv-03851-RMG)
Submitted: January 30, 2024 Decided: February 6, 2024
Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
David Antonio Little, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, DAVIDSON,
WREN & DEMASTERS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
David Antonio Little, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Little’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. Little v. Dixon, No. 0:22-cv-03851-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 5,
2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.