Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-6948•Eric Davis v. P. Freeman
23-6948Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15.04.2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6948
ERIC DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
P. FREEMAN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (4:23-cv-03590-MGL)
Submitted: April 11, 2024 Decided: April 15, 2024
Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eric Davis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a court order by failing to
complete a portion of the complaint form and failing to complete a summons form for the
Defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b);
Attkisson v. Holder, 925 F.3d 606, 620, 625-27 (4th Cir. 2019), and affirm the district
court’s order. Davis v. Freeman, No. 4:23-cv-03590-MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 11, 2023). We
deny Davis’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.