United States of America v. Andrew Scott Wilson, a/k/a Scott Andrew Wilson

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6960
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANDREW SCOTT WILSON, a/k/a Scott Andrew Wilson,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:21-cr-00203-BO-1)
Submitted: February 22, 2024 Decided: February 27, 2024
Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrew Scott Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Andrew Scott Wilson appeals the district court’s order ruling on several motions,
including denying Wilson’s motions for compassionate release, brought pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391,
§ 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239, and for other miscellaneous relief. After reviewing the
record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Wilson’s
motions. See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 78 F.4th 122, 127 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating
standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v.
Wilson, No. 5:21-cr-00203-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 6, 2023). We deny Wilson’s motion for
the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --