Kathy Reaves, a/k/a Kathy Juanita Reaves v. Identego/idemia; South Carolina Law Enforcement Division

23-7050Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.03.2024

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-7050
KATHY REAVES, a/k/a Kathy Juanita Reaves,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
IDENTEGO/IDEMIA; SOUTH CAROLINA LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (3:22-cv-01399-TLW)
Submitted: February 27, 2024 Decided: March 1, 2024
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kathy Reaves, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kathy Reaves appeals the district court’s order denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)
motion.* We have reviewed the record and discern no abuse of discretion in the denial of
this motion. See Aikens, 652 F.3d at 501 (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. Reaves v. IDENTEGO/IDEMIA, No. 3:22-cv-01399-TLW
(D.S.C. Oct. 10, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* To the extent Reaves seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing her complaint, that order is not
properly before us in this appeal. See Aikens v. Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011)
(en banc) (“[A]n appeal from denial of Rule 60(b) relief does not bring up the underlying
judgment for review.” (internal quotation marks omitted)).

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.